TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION
Teaching methods and aids used
Innovative Teaching Methods
E-Contents Uploaded in Knimbus Digital Library by Faculty Members
https://durgapurgovtcollege.knimbus.com/user#/home
Department’s Initiatives for Assessing Learning Levels of Students and address the students’ needs
Students with a kinaesthetic mode of adaptation are given special attention by faculty members. They are assigned small computer related assignments
Students with some psychical/ physical illness like tuberous sclerosis or 80% deformity due to cerebral palsy are catered individually in special classes so that they may overcome their fear of approaching thesubject and also feel free in expressing their thoughts and feel equal to adopt with the learning environment
The above screen shot shows the class link shared as Revision class for all for 3rd semester and 2nd semester Hons students. The Board work shared is on logic. The board works are shared in online classes as it would help students to rectify their logical deductions. The slow learners
are found to grasp the problem better by the help of visual representations of the logical deductions while the fast learners are told to consider the fact that each step logically deduced is equally important to fetch marks and get the argument valid.
The above screen shot shows Dr. Shalmoli Palit sharing some special suggestions on Kathoponishad for 5th semester Hons students. This is a schematic representation of the a few pertinent areas of the text which facilitates learning. The schematic representations are usually the areas based on the presuppositions of the theory or the text. This helps the fast learners to navigate and retain the fundamental points and the slow learners to be equipped for the upcoming issues that will be further taught in a like manner. It has been observed that the fast learners retain less and forget easily since their minds are found to be loaded with several ideas. They tend to understand fast and forget fast. In a way the slow learners retain well and hence if groomed well shines.
The above screen shot shows Dr. Shalmoli Palit sharing some special suggestions on Kathoponishad for 5th semester Hons students. This is a schematic representation of the a few pertinent areas of the text which facilitates learning. The schematic representations are usually the areas based on the presuppositions of the theory or the text. This helps the fast learners to navigate and retain the fundamental points and the slow learners to be equipped for the upcoming issues that will be further taught in a like manner. It has been observed that the fast learners retain less and forget easily since their minds are found to be loaded with several ideas. They tend to understand fast and forget fast. In a way the slow learners retain well and hence if groomed well shines.
The above screen shot shows Dr. Palit assigning Special class for First semester Hons and 5thsemester Hons students. Special classes are assigned to measure the progress of students. Progress in case of Fast learners means calmness of mind and more concentration while for slow learners extra classes actually work as a process of elimination of unnecessary thoughts which makes their thinking process slow. Here the teacher acts more of a facilitator removing hurdles in the way of learning. So special classes are more of correction classes
The above screen shot shows Professor Atasi Rajak sharing some e-contents with slow learners of 3rd semester Hons
The above screen shot shows 2nd semester program students, 5TH semester Hons Students and 3rd semester Generic students respectively engaged in conversations with Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal; Head Department of Philosophy. Dr. Kanjilal arranges classes with small groups of students engaging them in discussions on their learning disabilities. The students apparently feels that the discussion is not on any issue related to the syllabus and feels free to open up with their problems. The one message that Dr.Knajilal tries to deliver to students is that of compassion. With the progress of the conversation she tries to depict the fact that there are ways or remedies which the students may adopt. The students are then explained the usual cognitive activities or states of mind which is the reason behind the learning disorder that a student might be facing. For this she takes up explanations provided by Yoga Darsana and the aids thus prescribed. This is how the class is oriented in a fashion; where the students does not lose sight of Philosophy and at the same time finds a remedy to the problem. The student rather identifies the cause and feels relieved. Dr. Kanjilal stresses on the point that these are age old and time tested explanations which even today experts all over the world implements.
The above screen shot shows a slow learner is given an opportunity to read aloud her observations on a topic chosen from Western Philosophy in an extra class taken for 2nd semester Program students by Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal. Few of her friends are requested to listen to what is being read and ask questions thereby. The students who were said to ask questions were all easy learners. It was a test of patience and fellow feelings. It was a message that we must all inculcate a sense of tolerance for others. The slow learner had several mistakes in her deliberation but nonetheless she was confident enough after she was given the opportunity. Her friends appreciated her efforts and shared some suggestions. The class ended with a note from Dr. Kanjilal on the moral practices of Maitray (compassion) and Karuna (sympathy and empathy).
In Special class faculty members take initiatives to have a one to one interactive sessions on the use of online platforms/ online study/ future study/higher studies etc. Faculties arrange for short sessions with small groups so that each disorder or difficulty or incapacity of students be better addressed. Students are even taken to the Central library of the College to make them understand about the reading a library catalogue or simply how to use a library for that matter. Use and finding of reference books, journals etc are many a times not properly followed hence it might end up using and reading of the same text or reference book which actually ends up in writing of the same answers and creates boredom. Mini presentations made by students has also helped them in public talking and enhance their skills in framing arguments. The Reasoning skills also develop by the use of this mini presentation practice sessions.
Use of online study platforms being explained in special class. Students have oral presentations sessions in special class so that the fcaulties be able to assess the learning levels of students. Slow learners are given chances of appreaing for such sessions on a regular basis.
Modes of Internal Assessment
Rubrics are a useful method of assessment and are used by faculty members for several reasons as follows:
The Department of Philosophy aims to achieve the above mentioned goals and keeps in mind the above mentioned usefulness of Rubrics and hence has tried to adopt it. Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal, HOD. Department of Philosophy has adopted Rubrics as an Assessment tool. She uses Rubrics for marking Assignments that are given in her MOODLE site. The Analytic Rubrics helps her in grading students. The top axis runs with the scaling as from ‘Exceptional’ to ‘Poor’ while the side axis includes the assessment criteria for each component.
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF ANSWER SCRIPTS IN PHILOSOPHY
CATEGORY | EXCEPTIONAL(4) | SATISFACTORY(3) | UNSATISFACTORY(2) | POOR(1) |
PRESENTATION | The abstract | The Choice of | The abstract | The abstract |
OF THE ABSTRACT | thought/issue is | words | thought is less | thought is not |
THOUGHT | clearly/vividly put into | /expressions for | clear and not | understood |
words | depicting abstract | framed well. | ||
thought/issue | ||||
needs clarity | ||||
CONSTRUCTION | Arguments are framed | Arguments are | Arguments are one | The arguments |
OF THE | logically keeping the | framed | sided, and loosely | do not stand at |
ARGUEMENTS | validity and the | asymmetrically, | framed | all |
abstract thought in | not approximating | |||
mind maintaing the | the abstract | |||
balance of the answer | thought | |||
UNDERSTANDING | The | The understanding | The Philosophy | Failed to grasp |
OF THE | perception/understan | of the Philosophy | behind is twisted | the |
PHILOSOPHY
BEHIND |
ding of the Philosophy is clearly understood. | behind needs to be structured | and the understanding | Thought/Philoso phy behind |
went wrong in | ||||
places | ||||
USE OF | Use of Philosophical | Doubts and | Use of Language | Totally misinterpreted and was unable to apply Philosophical
language |
PHILOSOPHICAL | terminologies with all | confusion | and its | |
LANGUAGE | its connotations are | regarding | construction is not | |
excellent | Philosophical | satisfactory and for | ||
terminologies are | most of the cases | |||
evident at places | not philosophical | |||
SYMETRICAL | The answer includes | A few relevant | The answer is given | Inclusion of too |
WITH THE | all relevant points | points are too | flat and does not | many issues |
QUESTION | which were asked for | brief making the | satisfy the | which are not |
in the question. Hence | answer seemingly | requirement of the | relevant | |
symmetrical with the | lose its strength | question. | ||
Question | ||||
USE OF CRITICAL | The mode of | The use of | The mode of | The |
THINKING | presentation clearly | ratiocination/critic | presentation | presentation do |
projects the effort | al thinking is | projects the use of | not exhibit any | |
towards critically | projected as | critical thinking to | trace of critical | |
thinking of the issue | optional | the minimal | approach | |
CONCLUSION | Well Constructed | Fairly constructed | Abrupt ending | Too brief and
scanty an end |
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF GROUP DISCUSSIONS( NON EVALUATIVE)
CATEGORY | EXCEPTIONAL( 4) | SATISFACTOR Y(3) | UNSATISFACTO RY(2) | POOR(1) |
THE INITIATION OF THE | The abstract | Addressing of the | The abstract | The abstract |
ABSTRACT THOUGHT MADE BY | thought/issue/topich | abstract | thoughtis less clear | thought is waved |
THE GROUP | as a good kick start | thought/issue was | and not framed | to a certain extent |
conventional | well. | |||
CONSTRUCTION OF THE | The theory is | The theory has no | The theory is | The theory loses |
THEORY | validated thus | supporting data | loosely framed | its ground at the |
maintaing the | and hence seems | onset. | ||
balance of the talk. | asymmetrically. | |||
COORDINATION AND | The Group shows | Coordination has failed at certain points and hence the understanding of the Philosophy loses the
structure required |
The Philosophy | Frail signs of |
UNDERSTANDING OF THE | coordination and | behind is twisted | coordination. | |
PHILOSOPHY BEHIND | understanding of | and the | ||
the backdrop | understanding went | |||
Philosophy | wrong in places | |||
USE OF PHILOSOPHICAL LANGUAGE | The group has used Philosophical terminologies with all its connotations. | The group has used Philosophical terminologies along with common sensical
terms |
Use of Language and its construction is not satisfactory | Totally misinterpreted and was unable to apply Philosophical language |
USE OF CASE STUDY FOR | The Group has | The case study | The case study was | Did not take help |
MORAL EVALUATION | depicted case | showcased are not | ambiguous. | of any case study. |
study(present | that strong. | |||
situation)in regard | ||||
to the moral | ||||
evaluation of the | ||||
theory making it | ||||
symmetrical | ||||
USE OF CRITICAL THINKING | The group as well | Less use of | The use of critical | Too much |
as individual | ratiocination/critic | thinking flattened at | common sensical | |
members clearly | al thinking made. | places | ||
projected the efforts | ||||
towards critically | ||||
thinking over the | ||||
issue | ||||
USE OF TIME AND CONCLUSION | Sensible use of time | Fairly less time | Scanty and not a | Abrupt ending |
to reach the | management | logical end | ||
conclusion. Could | hence conclusion | |||
relate with the | not well | |||
initial point. | constructed |
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF PHILOSOPHICAL MUSINGS ( NON EVALUATIVE)
CATEGORY | EXCEPTIONAL(4) | SATISFACTORY(3) | UNSATISFACTORY(2) | POOR(1) |
HOW FAR IS THE
THOUGHT UNMINDFUL |
THE UNMINDFUL
INITIATION |
THE FRAMING IS
INTENTIONAL |
THE FRAMING IS
RATIONAL |
THE FRAMING IS
RATIONALLY STRUCTURED |
HOW THE ISSUE
IS MADE/ PRESENTED AS PHILOSOPHICAL |
THE THOUGHT IS
UNDERSTOOD TO BE PHILOSOPHICAL |
ADDRESSING OF
THE THOUGHT/ISSUE WAS CONVENTIONAL |
THE THOUGHT IS LESS
CLEAR AND NOT FRAMED WELL. |
THE THOUGHT
IS WAVED TO A CERTAIN EXTENT |
PICKING UP FROM EVERY DAY EXPERIENCE | PRESENTATION IS FREE FLOWING | PRESENTATION HAS A BACKUP FROM REASON | PRESENTATION IS MORE THEORETICAL | PRESENTATION IS STRUCTURED ON LOGIC |
USE OF HIS OWN PHILOSOPHY | UNMINDFUL USE
OF ONE’S PERCEPTION |
PURPOSELESS SHOWCASING OF
FACTS |
PURPOSEFUL PRESENTATION | TENDENCY TO REACH
CERTAINTY |
ALLOWING FREE THINKING | HIGHLY IMAGINATIVE AND
FREE |
HAS TRACES OF IMAGINATION | SHOWS RESTRAINMENT AND
STURUCTURE |
SHOWS ABSOLUTE
STRUCTURING |
HOW FAR IS IT THERAUPETIC | SENDS A MESSAGE OF HEALING THE
MIND |
SENDS MINOR PROVOCATIONS | SENDS LESSER INITIATIVES AND
BUILDS PRESSURE |
HIGHLY REGIMENTED |
HOW FAR IT SHOWS MINDS CAPACITY TO CREATE AND TRANSMIT PEACE | THE THOUGHT HAD PEACE/ RECONCIALATION/ EQUAL FEELING MESSAGES | THE THOUGHT HAD TRACES OF HOPE GIVING MESSAGE | THE THOUGHT INDICATED STRIFE | THE THOUGHT PROVOKED CONFLICT |
Oral and aural presentations being conducted in class
Students engaged in group discussions before their open book non-evaluative assessment
Small groups are assigned topics on moral issues/ social issues which they along with the faculty members discuss. The group discussion is primarily initiated by the faculty member setting the time limit and explaining the rubrics scale and criterion.