TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION

Teaching methods and aids used    

  • Chalk and Talk Lectures
  • Group discussions
  • PPT presentations
  • Use of Rubrics
  • MOODLE classroom
  • Uploading teaching material in Digital Library

 

Innovative Teaching Methods

  • Philosophical Parlour
  • Tutorial on mini presentation by students
  • Reasoning aptitude class

E-Contents Uploaded in Knimbus Digital Library by Faculty Members

https://durgapurgovtcollege.knimbus.com/user#/home

 

 

Department’s Initiatives for Assessing Learning Levels of Students and address the students’ needs

  • Orientation programme: Orientation for all students are conducted in special classes where a discursive method is adopted on common habits and liking of students to make them comfortable and then assigning them with small experimental everyday practice which would actually help them to concentrate and build confidence.

 

  • Effective Mentor-Mentee Interactions and Remedial Classes
  • Departments take initiatives in adopting innovative initiatives to assess the learning levels of students.  It has been observed that there are various learning habits that grow amongst students which they find to be convenient. There are also learning disorders amongst students which in fact may cause the difference in learning levels. The point however is to execute whatever has been learnt. The Department has taken special initiatives assess the learning levels so that the skill development be expected accordingly. Students are thus engaged in special classes in activities that would enable them to develop their skills; like simple computer skills involving the making of power point presentation, managing of their emails, making the aware of the skills of data keeping, making them conscious of saving their files and folders in drives of a computer where they may have their reading materials, searching for any research topic related to the topic given in their syllabus so on and so forth. The Department in fact takes help from students in keeping the huge student data for ordinary purposes; only to keep their habit of being acquainted with the computer keep going. The students who have a kinesthetic mode of adopting with the learning process find it easy and interesting. They in fact come forward with innovative ideas in case of designing/ sharing of ideas in case of mini presentation etc. So the practical special classes in case of computer skills become useful for fast learners who are also good executers of skills. The department in that case makes small groups and trains the students accordingly. The students with slow writing habits who are also slow learners in certain cases are individually adhered to. Their writing habits are looked after by giving them short writing assignments in class. There are some students who are found to suffer from extreme writing disorders due to some psychical/ physical illness like Tuberous Sclerosis or 80% deformity due to Cerebral Palsy. The faculty members of the department take special initiatives in special classes to cater their needs and guide them individually. The Departments also make arrangement of Orientation classes for all students so that faculties can interact with them and come close to the problems that may persist without the student being actually aware of the same. We try to talk with students in such orientation classes in segments and try to know their likes and dislikes, their habits, their hobbies, their pattern of thinking, their pattern of making routines and following of such routines so on and so forth

Students with a kinaesthetic mode of adaptation are given special attention by faculty members. They are assigned small computer related assignments

Students with some psychical/ physical illness like tuberous sclerosis or 80% deformity due to cerebral palsy are catered individually in special classes so that they may overcome their fear of approaching thesubject and also feel free in expressing their thoughts and feel equal to adopt with the learning environment

  • Doubt clearing classes taken for slow learners and One to one interactive class for slow learners and Board work class for fast learners,

 

The above screen shot shows the class link shared as Revision class for all for 3rd semester and 2nd semester Hons students. The Board work shared is on logic. The board works are shared in online classes as it would help students to rectify their logical deductions. The slow learners

are found to grasp the problem better by the help of visual representations of the logical deductions while the fast learners are told to consider the fact that each step logically deduced is equally important to fetch marks and get the argument valid.

 

The above screen shot shows Dr. Shalmoli Palit sharing some special suggestions on Kathoponishad for 5th semester Hons students. This is a schematic representation of the a few pertinent areas of the text which facilitates learning. The schematic representations are usually the areas based on the presuppositions of the theory or the text. This helps the fast learners to navigate and retain the fundamental points and the slow learners to be equipped for the upcoming issues that will be further taught in a like manner. It has been observed that the fast learners retain less and forget easily since their minds are found to be loaded with several ideas. They tend to understand fast and forget fast. In a way the slow learners retain well and hence if groomed well shines.

 

The above screen shot shows Dr. Shalmoli Palit sharing some special suggestions on Kathoponishad for 5th semester Hons students. This is a schematic representation of the a few pertinent areas of the text which facilitates learning. The schematic representations are usually the areas based on the presuppositions of the theory or the text. This helps the fast learners to navigate and retain the fundamental points and the slow learners to be equipped for the upcoming issues that will be further taught in a like manner. It has been observed that the fast learners retain less and forget easily since their minds are found to be loaded with several ideas. They tend to understand fast and forget fast. In a way the slow learners retain well and hence if groomed well shines.

 

The above screen shot shows Dr. Palit assigning Special class for First semester Hons and 5thsemester Hons students. Special classes are assigned to measure the progress of students. Progress in case of Fast learners means calmness of mind and more concentration while for slow learners extra classes actually work as a process of elimination of unnecessary thoughts which makes their thinking process slow. Here the teacher acts more of a facilitator removing hurdles in the way of learning. So special classes are more of correction classes

 

The above screen shot shows Professor Atasi Rajak sharing some e-contents with slow learners of 3rd semester Hons

The above screen shot shows Professor Sujoy Gayen sharing a Google Meet link for 5th semester Hons students and the attendance of the class. The class was assigned for slow learners.

The above screen shot shows 2nd semester program students, 5TH semester Hons Students and 3rd semester Generic students respectively engaged in conversations with Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal; Head Department of Philosophy. Dr. Kanjilal arranges classes with small groups of students engaging them in discussions on their learning disabilities. The students apparently feels that the discussion is not on any issue related to the syllabus and feels free to open up with their problems. The one message that Dr.Knajilal tries to deliver to students is that of compassion. With the progress of the conversation she tries to depict the fact that there are ways or remedies which the students may adopt. The students are then explained the usual cognitive activities or states of mind which is the reason behind the learning disorder that a student might be facing. For this she takes up explanations provided by Yoga Darsana and the aids thus prescribed. This is how the class is oriented in a fashion; where the students does not lose sight of Philosophy and at the same time finds a remedy to the problem. The student rather identifies the cause and feels relieved. Dr. Kanjilal stresses on the point that these are age old and time tested explanations which even today experts all over the world implements.

The above screen shot shows a slow learner is given an opportunity to read aloud her observations on a topic chosen from Western Philosophy in an extra class taken for 2nd semester Program students by Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal. Few of her friends are requested to listen to what is being read and ask questions thereby. The students who were said to ask questions were all easy learners. It was a test of patience and fellow feelings. It was a message that we must all inculcate a sense of tolerance for others. The slow learner had several mistakes in her deliberation but nonetheless she was confident enough after she was given the opportunity. Her friends appreciated her efforts and shared some suggestions. The class ended with a note from Dr. Kanjilal on the moral practices of Maitray (compassion) and Karuna (sympathy and empathy).

 

  • Skill enhancement in Special class

In Special class faculty members take initiatives to have a one to one interactive sessions on the use of online platforms/ online study/ future study/higher studies etc. Faculties arrange for short sessions with small groups so that each disorder or difficulty or incapacity of students be better addressed. Students are even taken to the Central library of the College to make them understand about the reading a library catalogue or simply how to use a library for that matter. Use and finding of reference books, journals etc are many a times not properly followed hence it might end up using and reading of the same text or reference book which actually ends up in writing of the same answers and creates boredom. Mini presentations made by students has also helped them in public talking and enhance their skills in framing arguments. The Reasoning skills also develop by the use of this mini presentation practice sessions.

Use of online study platforms being explained in special class. Students have oral presentations sessions in special class so that the fcaulties be able to assess the learning levels of students. Slow learners are given chances of appreaing for such sessions on a regular basis.

  • Fast learners are made to write short notes on an extempore basis. The extempore writing sessions are designed in such a manner that a fast learner may have to immediately write a note of at least 20 lines after he be given a topic on reasoning/ethical issue.

 

  • Mini presentation made by students in special class
  • Philosophical Parlour via Gnomio site
  • Parent-Teacher Meetings

 

Modes of Internal Assessment

  • Evaluative–Class Test,
  • Non-Evaluative–Group Discussion, Aural presentation, Use of Rubrics, (CO-PO excel file Prepared)

Rubrics are a useful method of assessment and are used by faculty members for several reasons as follows:

  1. If we want to save time writing the feedback/comments for each of the answers script that we are
  2. Making the evaluation process transparent to the students
  3. Making the students understand the areas where they need to work
  4. Making the students compare their several writings thus bringing a sense of self-assessment/ evaluation
  5. Forming an Inclusive and productive Learning

 

The Department of Philosophy aims to achieve the above mentioned goals and keeps in mind the above mentioned usefulness of Rubrics and hence has tried to adopt it. Dr. Bhumika Kanjilal, HOD. Department of Philosophy has adopted Rubrics as an Assessment tool. She uses Rubrics for marking Assignments that are given in her MOODLE site. The Analytic Rubrics helps her in grading students. The top axis runs with the scaling as from ‘Exceptional’ to ‘Poor’ while the side axis includes the assessment criteria for each component.

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF ANSWER SCRIPTS IN PHILOSOPHY

CATEGORY EXCEPTIONAL(4) SATISFACTORY(3) UNSATISFACTORY(2) POOR(1)
PRESENTATION The abstract The Choice of The abstract The abstract
OF THE ABSTRACT thought/issue is words thought is less thought is not
 
THOUGHT clearly/vividly put into /expressions for clear and not understood
words depicting abstract framed well.
thought/issue
needs clarity
CONSTRUCTION Arguments are framed Arguments are Arguments are one The arguments
OF THE logically keeping the framed sided, and loosely do not stand at
ARGUEMENTS validity and the asymmetrically, framed all
abstract thought in not approximating
mind maintaing the the abstract
balance of the answer thought
UNDERSTANDING The The understanding The Philosophy Failed to grasp
OF THE perception/understan of the Philosophy behind is twisted the
PHILOSOPHY

BEHIND

ding of the Philosophy is clearly understood. behind needs to be structured and the understanding Thought/Philoso phy behind
went wrong in
places
USE OF Use of Philosophical Doubts and Use of Language Totally misinterpreted and was unable to apply Philosophical

language

PHILOSOPHICAL terminologies with all confusion and its
LANGUAGE its connotations are regarding construction is not
excellent Philosophical satisfactory and for
terminologies are most of the cases
evident at places not philosophical
SYMETRICAL The answer includes A few relevant The answer is given Inclusion of too
WITH THE all relevant points points are too flat and does not many issues
QUESTION which were asked for brief making the satisfy the which are not
in the question. Hence answer seemingly requirement of the relevant
symmetrical with the lose its strength question.
Question
USE OF CRITICAL The mode of The use of The mode of The
THINKING presentation clearly ratiocination/critic presentation presentation do
projects the effort al thinking is projects the use of not exhibit any
towards critically projected as critical thinking to trace of critical
thinking of the issue optional the minimal approach
CONCLUSION Well Constructed Fairly constructed Abrupt ending Too brief and

scanty an end

 

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF GROUP DISCUSSIONS( NON EVALUATIVE)

 

CATEGORY EXCEPTIONAL( 4) SATISFACTOR Y(3) UNSATISFACTO RY(2) POOR(1)
THE INITIATION OF THE The abstract Addressing of the The abstract The abstract
ABSTRACT THOUGHT MADE BY thought/issue/topich abstract thoughtis less clear thought is waved
THE GROUP as a good kick start thought/issue was and not framed to a certain extent
conventional well.
CONSTRUCTION OF THE The theory is The theory has no The theory is The theory loses
THEORY validated thus supporting data loosely framed its ground at the
maintaing the and hence seems onset.
balance of the talk. asymmetrically.
COORDINATION AND The Group shows Coordination has failed at certain points and hence the understanding of the Philosophy loses the

structure required

The Philosophy Frail signs of
UNDERSTANDING OF THE coordination and behind is twisted coordination.
PHILOSOPHY BEHIND understanding of and the
the backdrop understanding went
Philosophy wrong in places
USE OF PHILOSOPHICAL LANGUAGE The group has used Philosophical terminologies with all its connotations. The group has used Philosophical terminologies along with common sensical

terms

Use of Language and its construction is not satisfactory Totally misinterpreted and was unable to apply Philosophical language
USE OF CASE STUDY FOR The Group has The case study The case study was Did not take help
MORAL EVALUATION depicted case showcased are not ambiguous. of any case study.
study(present that strong.
situation)in regard
to the moral
evaluation of the
theory making it
symmetrical
USE OF CRITICAL THINKING The group as well Less use of The use of critical Too much
as individual ratiocination/critic thinking flattened at common sensical
members clearly al thinking made. places
projected the efforts
towards critically
thinking over the
issue
USE OF TIME AND CONCLUSION Sensible use of time Fairly less time Scanty and not a Abrupt ending
to reach the management logical end
conclusion. Could hence conclusion
relate with the not well
initial point. constructed

 

 

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF PHILOSOPHICAL MUSINGS ( NON EVALUATIVE)

CATEGORY EXCEPTIONAL(4) SATISFACTORY(3) UNSATISFACTORY(2) POOR(1)
HOW FAR IS THE

THOUGHT UNMINDFUL

THE UNMINDFUL

INITIATION

THE FRAMING IS

INTENTIONAL

THE FRAMING IS

RATIONAL

THE FRAMING IS

RATIONALLY STRUCTURED

HOW THE ISSUE

IS MADE/ PRESENTED AS PHILOSOPHICAL

THE THOUGHT IS

UNDERSTOOD TO BE PHILOSOPHICAL

ADDRESSING OF

THE THOUGHT/ISSUE WAS CONVENTIONAL

THE THOUGHT IS LESS

CLEAR AND NOT FRAMED WELL.

THE THOUGHT

IS WAVED TO A CERTAIN EXTENT

PICKING UP FROM EVERY DAY EXPERIENCE PRESENTATION IS FREE FLOWING PRESENTATION HAS A BACKUP FROM REASON PRESENTATION IS MORE THEORETICAL PRESENTATION IS STRUCTURED ON LOGIC
USE OF HIS OWN PHILOSOPHY UNMINDFUL USE

OF ONE’S

PERCEPTION

PURPOSELESS SHOWCASING OF

FACTS

PURPOSEFUL PRESENTATION TENDENCY TO REACH

CERTAINTY

ALLOWING FREE THINKING HIGHLY IMAGINATIVE AND

FREE

HAS TRACES OF IMAGINATION SHOWS RESTRAINMENT AND

STURUCTURE

SHOWS ABSOLUTE

STRUCTURING

HOW FAR IS IT THERAUPETIC SENDS A MESSAGE OF HEALING THE

MIND

SENDS MINOR PROVOCATIONS SENDS LESSER INITIATIVES AND

BUILDS PRESSURE

HIGHLY REGIMENTED
HOW FAR IT SHOWS MINDS CAPACITY TO CREATE AND TRANSMIT PEACE THE THOUGHT HAD PEACE/ RECONCIALATION/ EQUAL FEELING MESSAGES THE THOUGHT HAD TRACES OF HOPE GIVING MESSAGE THE THOUGHT INDICATED STRIFE THE THOUGHT PROVOKED CONFLICT

Oral and aural presentations being conducted in class

Students engaged in group discussions before their open book non-evaluative assessment

Small groups are assigned topics on moral issues/ social issues which they  along with the faculty members discuss. The group discussion is primarily  initiated by the faculty member setting the time limit and explaining the rubrics scale and criterion.